From time-to-time we all read or hear an explanation that is so simple, so obvious, that we feel like slapping our own head and exclaiming: “Of course, why didn’t I think of that!” or “Of course, why didn’t I see that before now.”
As President Trump’s declaration that he’s about to address “birthright citizenship” – and so its consequential “birth tourism” and “anchor babies.” May I here offer an explanation of “birthright citizenship” that I believe qualifies as one of those head-slapping explanations; one that illustrates just how “birthright citizenship” as presently accepted is inherently farcical:
To accept the current practice(s) of “birthright citizenship,” one has to accept the premise that the United States of America has decided that any woman anywhere in the world can unilaterally grant her child (or children) U.S. citizenship, merely by showing up on U.S. soil in time for delivery. In fact, she doesn’t even have to be legally present in the United States, she merely has to “migrate” here in time for the blessed event of birth.
When we put it that way, doesn’t the absolute stupidity, the inherently farcical nature of the currently-accepted practice come into sharp relief?
There is no way that any of the drafters of the Constitution or its ratified amendments, nor the U.S. Supreme Court, nor any President or Congress intended such a premise. (Albeit, the elected officials of today’s Democrat Party very much intend to retain it – they see “migration” as the mechanism for executing the Cloward-Piven Strategy to take-down the USA.)
Permitting such a system of “birthright citizenship” constitutes an abdication of duty, a deliberate nullification of our national sovereignty.
War or revolution also seek nullification of existing national sovereignty; and those whose loyalty is supposed to be to the existing nation commit treason when they work to aid or abet such nullification.
Unrestricted “Migration” + “Birthright Citizenship” = Sovereign Nullification = Treason = Conquest