There are several credible voices questioning the efficacy and post-jab health consequences of the Covid “vaccines.” By the way, the quotation marks around “vaccines” reflect the fact that in August, 2021, the CDC had altered its definition of “vaccine” so that the experimental mRNA concoctions could be shoehorned into that definition. (A list of resources appears at the end; it is not comprehensive, but provides an excellent start for those who want to conduct their own due diligence.)
Among those are voices arguing that the actual purpose of the mRNA concoctions is actually to achieve substantial depopulation of the planet.
Meanwhile, there are some that attribute the global push (actually, coercion) to get injected with multiple “free” rounds of the mRNA concoction (a/k/a “Covid vaccine”) – sourced through (usually secret) procurement contracts between the manufacturers and national governments (or their “health agencies”) – as “merely” attributable to greed and the prospects of tens-of-billions in profits to the manufacturers (plus folks down the “healthcare” distribution chain and, presumably, payola to the government officials).
Tellingly, reports indicate that most (all?) of those secret contracts require governments (i.e., citizens / taxpayers) to completely immunize the manufacturers from and all liability – pun intended – and so absorb all costs resulting from death or injury. Protecting and preserving pharmaceutical industry profits.
Meanwhile, reports indicate that the pre-release testing of the concoctions was (deliberately) insufficient, if not outright fraudulent. Nevertheless, upon the concoctions’ mass-release upon a public told (unrelentingly) that they were “safe and effective.” An ever-growing body of evidence demonstrates that they are neither. Based on the pre-authorization testing, and subsequent results, we know that the mRNA concoctions were and are still not effective against “the virus” – and that manufacturers and government agency insiders knew this all along.
Not only are the concoctions not effective against the Covid virus and its mutations, they render the recipients even more susceptible to future strains. And then there are the side effects … terms such “sudden death” and “myocarditis” and “stroke” (even among young people) are in common usage now. Sudden death events are occurring daily, with increasing frequency.
So that leaves us with the question whether it was all a global financial grab on an unprecedented scale, or a depopulation plot – or both? I vote for “both,” for reasons we’ll discuss.
The ever-growing body of evidence supports “both.” The recent (and explosive) Project Veritas expose of the Pfizer mRNA executive, in which he exhibits an amoral drive for money, no matter the human toll. That Pfizer executive also posits that the Covid cash-cow virus originated at the CCP-run Wuhan bioweapons lab. You know, that virus from a Fauci-funded CCP bioweapons lab – this though they were at first telling us that it was a natural mutation that “jumped-species” at a Wuhan “wet market.”
Though beyond the scope of this piece, it is open-source documented that the CCP is a proponent of biological warfare, including “prewar” deployment to weaken an adversary. (Now, ponder the impact on our military of the forced “vaccination.”) Note that during the period we’re discussing, the CCP did not subject its own people to the mRNA concoctions.
Indeed, not so many years ago, a senior CCP military official advocated using bioweapons to eliminate hundreds of millions of Americans, so that the CCP / PRC could take over the western U.S. and use its farmland to feed the Chinese.
Now ponder the Globalist-CCP Axis. The CCP and WEF are what we might refer to as “partners.” In turn, on the WEF website, both Pfizer and Moderna are listed as WEF “partners.” In fact, one might conclude that they’re all “partners.”
SADS – Sudden Adult Death Syndrome has entered the lexicon, accompanied by statistical data evidencing (otherwise inexplicable) increases in “all-cause mortality” … not to mention videos of post-jab athletes keeling over and dying on the playing field. This, even as the concoction’s manufacturers report eye-popping profits in the billions.
At the same time, in the United States (at least), the FDA-approved “vaccine” (Comirnaty) was not actually made available to the public. Instead, the administered concoctions were issued under an “Emergency Use Authorization” – in this context, a regulatory sleight-of-hand that preserved the manufacturers total legal immunity for injury or death resulting.
So, it’s a fair question whether or not the depopulation theorists were not tinfoil-hat “conspiracy theorists,” but instead sentinels who sounded the alarm, but who’s message was (mostly) suppressed by a cabal of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, NGO’s such as WHO and the WEF, government and corporate media.
If so, then we must ask what were the Globalist-CCP Axis’ ultimate goals?
And how successful have they been toward reaching them – so far, and ultimately?
And can justice be brought to those responsible?
In other words, have Pfizer et als. been successful, or did they “pfu*k up?”
Variations in the number and severity of (relatively immediate) post-jab injuries based on manufacturer lot number was identified early on. Companies like Pfizer (and Moderna) presumably don’t have such wide variations in manufacturing without intent … surely their “quality control” is better than that. (More on this below.)
Query: Due to the significant manufacturing variances, do some (or all) of the lots fall outside of the parameters of even the EUA, as they don’t match what study information (such as it was) submitted to the FDA and other countries’ medical authorities??? So, were some lots never legally approved at all? And if so, is this not a potential angle of legal attack against them?
What about state and federal consumer protection statutes? The concoctions were marketed as “safe and effective.” We now know they were neither. But to the extent that lots / batches were outside the boundaries of the EUA approval, wasn’t shipping and dispensing those an act of fraud? Were they not defective medical products misleadingly (at best) labeled and advertised? And to the extent they caused harm …
Were the variations sloppy manufacturing processes? Was it all rushed due to a timeframe being pushed up because of a premature (though not necessarily) unintentional release from the Wuhan bioweapons lab – perhaps executed earlier than initially planned, due to the then-upcoming 2020 election and desire to derail President Trump (who the CCP and globalist interests all apparently viewed as a major threat)?
Or rushed simply in a greedy effort to cash-in on the Covid hype they’d fomented?
Sloppiness through rushing might be one element, but doesn’t adequately explain the coordinated (internationally) psyop about Covid, the “vaccines,” and the coercion for multiple injections.
Recall that the pre-release studies (such as they were) demonstrated both ineffectiveness and deadliness of the “vaccines” – and the study doses would have been exact, not mass-manufactured sloppy batches. So the release under a EUA would not have taken place would not have occurred absent knowledge (if not intent) to kill people.
And even if monetary greed – and not depopulation – was all of it, that’s more than enough for liability to be found on the part of the perpetrators, even trial for crimes against humanity.
But were the manufacturing variations intentional, part of a vast medical experiment to see what formulations caused what effects, so as to have the data for later injections – boosters, or future “vaccines” with the mRNA technology? To kill people on a mass scale, gradually, so as to maintain plausible deniability?
Were the varying formulations intended to diffuse the degree of harmful impact on immune systems across the globe, so that it would help mask the correlation with the root cause (i.e., the mRNA concoctions) … or to cause down-range death and disease in diverse forms (further helping to mask the correlation with the “vaccines”)?
Was it all but a “Phase I” of a planned, coordinated and actively executed depopulation plot. A global genocide perpetrated by the Globalist-CCP Axis?
For now, these are open questions – but valid ones. Truth will emerge, despite the best efforts to bury it (pun intended). But the ever-growing body of evidence, coupled with the nature of the Globalist-CCP Axis and their prior support for mass depopulation – albeit, perhaps each for their own reasons – increasingly supports the conclusion of “both.”
If this is the case, Pfizer et als. didn’t “pfu*k up,” but instead were (and still are) executing a genocidal plan … and massively cashing-in along the way. A potential genocide that dwarfs all before it.
As deaths mount, and evidence keeps emerging, it’s going to be an interesting legal landscape in the coming years.
The “vaccines” injected into Americans were not FDA approved; they were injected under EUA (Emergency Use Authorization). Thus, at least presumptively, the manufacturers have no liability for the injuries and deaths, the number of which are mounting by the day … as is the awareness of the “vaccines” being the proximate cause.
Corporations (and other institutions) across the land compelled their employees to subject themselves to the EUA products, which could create some interesting dynamics. On the one hand, the corporations — likely facing class-action suits from current and former employees — might try to defend on multiple grounds.
Perhaps a variation of “we were just following orders” defense used at the Nuremburg trials, albeit this time “we were just following CDC guidance.”
Perhaps attempting to classify the injuries and deaths as a “workplace injury,” which would limit their liability to workers’ compensation premiums, but also serving as an admission that they are responsible (public reputation risk).
Or they might say that the employee’s exercised a “choice” — they could have refused the jab, and resign, and so assumed the risk of the EUA “vaccines.” To which the employees’ attorneys may seek to rebut as coercion via “constructive discharge” by the corporations. Query: If corporate communications peddled the lie that what the employees were being forced to inject was “FDA approved,” could be legal liability for fraud by the corporation on that basis alone?
The “personal injury” legal industry is adept at creatively, and tangentially developing bases for liability on the part of their targeted defendants. The “vaccine mandates” may prove to not only be the most lucrative horse for them to ride since the notorious tobacco lawsuits, but probably the most lucrative they will ever enjoy (or exploit, depending upon your point of view).
And then, there’s the prospect of “Nuremburg II” and bringing a whole host of individuals to international trial for “crimes against humanity.” Along the way, many of them “ratting out” others as the pursue leniency and plea bargains. The whole Globalist-CCP Axis could well be exposed for the demonic evil it represents, and serves.
As for justice, well, as I recall, many of those found guilty at the original Nuremberg were hanged … which expedited their ultimate trial before their Maker.
Research Sources (in alphabetical order):
Children’s Health Defense (Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.)
Steve Kirsch:
Dr. Robert Malone: