In this piece:
Trump – he went there!
Is an Autopen an ADA “reasonable accommodation” for the disability of non compos mentis?
Is void ab initio (finally) about to play out?
Are the Autopen revelations “the luck of the Irish,” or the “Hand of Providence?”
Trump – he went there!
In recent weeks, thanks to the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project, it has been disclosed that nearly all of Joe Biden’s executive orders – in particular the pardons – were signed with an Autopen.
Some – such as Cynical Publius on X – have opined that nothing would come of it (“We all know that Joe Biden's executive orders and pardons were signed via autopen by a 27 year-old staffer with green hair. We all know he had no idea what was being signed in his name. Yet nothing will ever be done about this because it will be too big of a shock to the U.S. system and will open a sort of political Pandora's Box whose contents are unknowable. This is just brutal truth, sorry.”).
Such cynicism (no pun intended) is understandable; we’ve endured several sequential years in which outright traitors to our country have been immune from prosecution. Indeed, many have instead been enriched, by forces foreign and domestic.
But as this St. Patrick’s Day dawned, President Donald Trump went there:
We have to assume that he knows and has more, i.e., court and/or court martial admissible grade evidence, than he’s letting on.
Court cases seemingly inevitable; get out your popcorn, put your feet up, and prepare to enjoy a show of historical, possibly Biblical proportions.
Is an Autopen an ADA “reasonable accommodation” for the disability of non compos mentis?
Even before the 2020 election, this writer opined that if elected (or installed, as we now know), Biden would be but a hollowed-out figurehead, a prop, serving the interest of forces behind the scene who actually would run things. I analogized it to a 1968 Star Trek episode titled “Patterns of Force.”
The analogy has held up, more so than I ever imagined. I was not prescient – just paying attention and using critical thinking skills.
Over the course of the so-called Biden administration, the corporatist / legacy media – with more than a little help from collaborative Republicans – kept a lid on Biden’s mental condition.
Yet, a decision was made to use that mental deterioration – that non compos mentis status – as a shield to avoid prosecuting Biden for black-and-white violations of law. See, Special Counsel Robert Hur.
In the upcoming court battles over, e.g., the validity of the Autopen’d pardons issued by “President” Biden, one argument will likely be along the lines of the use of them being something analogous to a “reasonable accommodation” under ADA (The Americans with Disabilities Act).
Under the ADA, something like a tool or special equipment may be a “reasonable accommodation” when it enables the individual with a covered disability to perform the “essential functions” of the job.
One can envision counsel for the (formerly) pardoned arguing that the use of an Autopen did not invalidate the pardons, so long as “President” Biden did in fact authorize them.
However, under the ADA, “reasonable accommodations” are irrelevant if they cannot render the individual capable of performing the “essential functions.” Once someone cannot perform the “essential functions” with or without a “reasonable accommodation,” they are no longer protected by the ADA, and can be terminated.
Well, we have Biden’s own Justice Department (in effect) having made a legal determination that (before the pardons were issued) he was non compos mentis – with no “reasonable accommodation” available to make him capable of performing the “essential functions” of being a criminal defendant … much less President of the United States of America in charge, among other things, of our nuclear weapons.
Is void ab initio (finally) about to play out?
Shortly after the 2020 election steal / coup d’etat, this writer posted a piece on Trevor Loudon’s site regarding void ab initio (here).
In short, under law, actions that spring from a fraudulent commencement can be declared null and void from the beginning. As if they never happened. The premise then was that all official acts taken by the illegitimate Biden-Harris Junta could be overturned.
Back then, it was still hoped that the actual election results would soon be revealed, and that the rightful winner (Trump) restored to office, and the damage from Biden nullified under the doctrine of void ab initio.
Reading the tea leaves, it appears that the evidence may yet be revealed, albeit now during Trump’s second term.
This Autopen imbroglio, and the court hearings and evidence presented relevant thereto, could not only demonstrate non compos mentis on the part of Biden from “day one” of his “administration,” but also introduce the evidence of the conspiracy to install him as a figurehead.
Which would open the door to litigation executing void ab initio for all official acts of the Biden “administration.”
This writer suspects that the evidence is actually so overwhelming that even a notoriously weak Roberts court would find it near-impossible to rule otherwise.
Are the Autopen revelations “the luck of the Irish,” or “the Hand of Providence?”
The latter.
While the four years of Biden were excruciating – especially knowing that our beloved country had been subjected to a treasonous coup d’etat, definitely including enemies domestic, that presumably were collaborating with enemies foreign – perhaps in God’s infinite wisdom, it was necessary.
In these recent times we have had Jeffrey Epstein, the Hunter Biden laptop, Russiagate, manufactured impeachments and a manufactured “insurrection.” Oh, and those who collaborated to execute, and then cover it all up. And, in their hubris, believing that mass-Autopen use would not be discovered – when even the addled Biden could probably still sign things when instructed, on camera, though having little-to-no conception of the content of the documents.
Oh, and how could we not forget two assassination attempts – for which it is still an open question if there might have been government official’s involvement – yet both unsuccessful.
And the Autopen may well prove to be mightier than the sword; a means through which our Constitutional Republic may be restored, and healed - peacefully, without “the sword.”
Random chance, or luck, are wholly inadequate to explain this all.
No, for a Believer the answer is obvious – God has heard our prayers to save our Divinely-inspired country; to give us another chance, undeserving though we may be.