Mamdani’s Mini-Marts
A revolutionary's "camel's nose under the tent"
While the mind’s eye might find the concept of “Mamdani’s Mini-Marts” to be humorous – and his “rent freeze” perhaps less so – what it portends is of existential importance for the future survival of our Constitutional Republic. Determining, perhaps, whether it will survive another 250 years … or merely another 2.5 or so.
This is not hyperbole. As we’ll see …
Winston Churchill once opined: The further back I look, the further forward I can see.
In that spirit, sometimes revisiting (somewhat aged) books provides invaluable context for current events, and facilitates anticipating what may be coming. For present purposes, let us briefly revisit two books:
2007’s “The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party” by David Horowitz and Richard Poe, and …
2010’s “Radical in Chief – Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism” by Stanley Kurtz.
In the interest of brevity, in this piece we won’t delve too much into “Shadow Party,” other than to point out that: the title explains much, given that George Soros is still one of the most major forces of evil among us, while Hillary Clinton has historical ties to Saul Alinsky (of “Rules for Radicals” infamy); and that if one reads “Shadow Party,” one will recognize that today’s tussle within the Democrat Party – as Mamdani’s cadre of “Democrat Socialists of America” is defeating incumbent Democrats from within the party primary process – is not new or spontaneous, but marks the approaching consummation stage of a treasonous, revolutionary plot commenced decades ago.
For present purposes, we will devote more time to “Radical in Chief.” For within it we find the “why” behind “Mamdani’s Mini-Marts,” his new “rent freeze,” and what else may be coming … if he is not stopped.
For you see, Mamdani isn’t original, he’s a successor – especially (I would argue) of B. Hussein Obama. Mamdani is the current “elected” quarterback of the Red-Green Axis, for which Obama previously advanced the ball into the “red zone.”
“Radical in Chief” delves back into the machinations of the Collectivist-Marxist revolutionaries prior to Obama … and in so doing, provides great insight into the subworld that cultivated Hillary Clinton, B. Hussein Obama and Zohran Mamdani (and the “Democratic Socialists of America” et als.).
There are names that occur and reoccur in the lives of Hillary Clinton, B. Hussein Obama – and, spiritually if not directly – with Zohran Mamdani. Names such as Heather Booth and her “Midwest Academy,” Wade Rathke and “ACORN,” Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn (the “just a guy from my neighborhood” yet who were invited guests to the opening of B. Hussein Obama’s Presidential Library cum flak tower).
There are also concepts aimed at gradually overthrowing our Constitutional Republic and replacing it with a Socialist state (presumably as an interim, until full-blown Communism can be imposed, as it the progression outlined by Karl Marx).
A key concept (or tactic) is “non-reformist reforms.” Here, a quote from “Radical in Chief” will introduce the underlying scheme:
So the President [Obama] is carrying out the ideals of his community-organizer past from a new position. The socialist organizers who taught and inspired Obama favored plans to quietly transform America’s economic system with “non-reformist reforms” – programs that appear as minor adjustments to capitalism but in fact undermine the system itself. This strategy was favored by Obama’s socialist mentors and associates at New York’s Socialist Scholars Conferences, the Midwest Academy, and ACORN.
More from “Radical in Chief”:
Originally President Obama pushed hard to include a ‘public option’ in the health-care [Obamacare] bill. A government-run health-care plan designed to “compete” with private insurers parallels proposals by the Citizen/Labor Energy Coalition to create a government-owned energy corporation. The term “competition” in this context is a misnomer, since entities backed by the taxing, law-making and regulatory power of the federal government can easily drive private companies out of business. That is exactly what the socialist sponsors of the Citizen/Labor Energy Coalition were hoping for.
Apply that template to grocery stores and – voilà – you have “Mamdani’s Mini-Marts.”
The same dynamic, albeit with some differences in execution, applies to the (non-reformist reform) “rent freeze.” As some have pointed out – such as NYC Councilwoman Vickie Paladino – the freeze on top-line revenue while allowing underlying costs to increase will result in private-sector landlords being eliminated.
So, in NYC, eventually there will be solely government-controlled access to food and shelter. If you want totalitarian control over a population, controlling the availability of food and shelter do the trick. Some might call that Communism.
FOR MAMDANI AND HIS ILK, FAILURE IS AN OPTION
Some have opined that Mamdani’s programs will fail, particularly as he’s driving-out the NYC tax base. And that the residents – citizens and illegal aliens – will turn on him and the DSA.
Don’t think that failure isn’t necessarily part of the plan.
The Socialist schemes described in “Radical in Chief” seek economic collapse as a prerequisite to consummating their revolution.
This includes – but is not limited to – “The Cloward-Piven Strategy.”
So, to believe that Mamdani and his DSA policies will inevitably collapse the NYC economy, turning people against him, and so anticipating that we don’t have to worry about him because “people will learn the lesson of Socialism the hard way” … could be catastrophically naïve.
No, better to confront the Collectivist threat head-on. Including educating the public about their revolutionary goals, their tactics (“non-reformist reforms”) – and their foreign backers (e.g., the CCP). And, I would argue, their Satanic roots.
Thankfully, President Trump seems to get it (though we can’t rely upon him alone):
