The Tranny Train Just Might Derail the Whole LGBT(a-z) Agenda
Now Let Me Get This Straight (pun Intended) …
For decades now, the LGBTQ(a-z) “community” has been demanding that we not just accept or tolerate, but “celebrate” the totality of their “lifestyle” – because they were “born this way.”
Initially, the “born this way” premise was used as a lever for the then-professed end-goal of mere “tolerance.” “We didn’t make a choice – we were born this way – so just let us earn a living in workplaces, and live our private lives.”
That resonated with Christians, and rightly so. Hate the sin, love the sinner. Judge not, lest you be judged. And it resonated with the American sentiment of “live and let live.” All for the good. (But as we now know, the “tolerance” mantra was not the actual agenda. Far from it.)
Further, civil rights law has long protected “immutable characteristics” from discrimination: “born this way” characteristics that an individual had no say in, nor can change. One is born with a particular racial makeup. At conception, one’s new life is determined as being either male or female (it is not “assigned at birth”).
The LGBTQ(a-z) tacticians of course recognized the potential of an “immutable characteristic” / “born this way” platform; from a “socially tactical” standpoint, if it could be successfully established, legal recognition would come. Legal recognition that would offer not only “protection from discrimination,” but could also be used as a bludgeon (e.g., against Christian organizations, and Christianity itself).
So, the “advocates” essentially crossed-dressed the (valid) civil rights arguments employed by Blacks into an LGBTQ(a-z) argument, i.e., rainbow = “born this way.” Many savvy Blacks have recognized the dynamic, and aren’t happy about it.
As we may surmise was plotted from the beginning, once the “advocates” achieved “tolerance” by coupling “born this way” with a self-serving aura of “civil rights,” they moved the goalposts. Not just tolerance, but forced embrace of the entire agenda is now cloaked as “civil rights” and “justice.”
Hence, we now have “Pride Month.” Even Blacks – with a meritorious basis and history – only got “Black History Month,” not a whole month of “Black” inescapably festooned in advertising and stores and workplaces.
Hence with this forced embrace, we had the Supreme Court supersede state sovereignty, and impose homosexual (civil) marriages. (“Civil marriages,” as those will not be marriages in the eyes of God.) And later shoe-horned “transgender” into federal civil rights / anti-sexual discrimination law.
Also, in many places, there are bans on reparative therapy (a/k/a conversion therapy) for homosexual (and, presumably, “transsexual”) sufferers.
All this now at the point where we’re confronting the next stage of their agenda, one inarguably demonic: they’re going after children. Even “baseball and apple pie” is “transitioning” to “grooming and KY” (or something to that effect).
Drag queens; gender-pretending surgery (a/k/a “gender affirming surgery”) for children without parental knowledge or consent; and emerging – forced “acceptance” of pedophilia (a/k/a MAP’s) – note, even the U.N. is promoting a path for pedophilia.
BUT THESE LATEST ESCALATIONS FOR THE LGBTQ(a-z) AGENDA — TRANSSEXUALISM AND “MINOR ATTRACTED PERSONS” — MAY BE EXPOSING AN INITIAL FABRICATION OF “BORN THIS WAY,” AND SO MAY PROVE TO BE THE UNDOING OF THE ENTIRE LGBTQ(a-z) ENTERPRISE
Whereas race is a normal human variation – as is “male” or “female” – non-heterosexual inclinations or “identity” are not normal human variations (not only in a Biblical sense, this is basic biology).
People are “born this way” with all kinds of conditions, e.g., Down’s Syndrome. People with such conditions deserve empathy and tolerance (to a degree). Yet “born this way” that doesn’t render those conditions “normal,” nor desirable.
Further, as we will see, it is an emerging question whether or not the LGBTQ(a-z) inclinations even qualify as “immutable.”
Recent articles are highlighting not just an increase in people “identifying” as one (or more?) of the LGBTQ(a-z) “rainbow” (e.g., here), but also significant variances across the globe (e.g., here).
IF “BORN THIS WAY” IS TRUE, THEN WHY THE LGBTQ(a-z) COMPULSION TO GROOM CHILDREN?
If “born this way” were true – if LGBTQ(a-z) were truly an “immutable characteristic – then how does one explain the variances in rates, and variances across both generational and geographic measures? Grooming would neither be necessary, or effective.
But the recently reported increases in those so-“identifying,” and the geographic and generational variances in such reports, would imply that grooming is effective, at least at the margins.
It becomes a fair question, then, if LGBTQ(a-z) is not immutable, but mutable?
And if so, if reparative and/or other therapies or treatments indeed do have at least some validity?
Even if medical, genetic or psychiatric fields are not yet advanced enough to resolve all cases, does not medical and scientific ethics require helping those that can be helped? And engaging in research to improve “the science” so as to be able to help more people?
Most importantly, if LGBTQ(a-z) is mutable, in whole or even just in part, does it not become a public health crisis to protect children from grooming????
SO, WE ASK AGAIN: IF “BORN THIS WAY” IS TRUE, THEN WHY THE LGBTQ(a-z) COMPULSION TO GROOM CHILDREN?
P.S. If you haven’t seen it, Matt Walsh’s documentary “What is a Woman” has garnered over 100 million views — this though it’s been banned by the usual suspects. You can see it (free) here.